Coca-Cola Tries to "Get the Target Off Our Backs" by Persuading the Public That Diet Coke and Other "No-Calorie" Drinks Are Healthy and More Clever Marketing Tactics

Coca-Cola is getting into some very clever, if not misguided marketing tactics to somehow convince John Q. American Public that there's a place in the diet for both empty-calorie, sugary soft drinks and/or chemical-laden "diet drinks."

Not only that, but Coke is "on a mission" to tack on the phrase "health and wellness" onto Diet Coke and other "no-calorie" drinks. You can learn about these marketing ploys, thanks to Duane D. Stanford of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, who was in Scottsdale, Arizona recently, where he attended the annual conference of the Consumer Analyst Group of New York.

Mind you, I wasn't in Scottsdale myself, but journalist Stanford heard Coke CEO Neville Isdell share insights into the soft drink company's marketing approaches to offset flat sales of its carbonated soft drinks.

For instance, in his astute article, entitled "Coke tries to shift obesity focus off its drinks," Stanford reportsof the Atlanta Journal-Constitution that Isdell announced plans to broaden the debate over the obesity epidemic so Coke can "get the target off our backs."

What?

Yes, according to Atlanta Journal-Constitution reporter Duane Stanford, Isdell branded millions of us who are health-minded as "targets"! And he wants us to quit revealing the truth about Coke's products, including seemingly innocent ones named "Coke Zero" or "Diet Coke Plus."

Reportedly, one way Coke plans to "get the target off our backs" is to use different terminology for diet drinks. Indeed, rather than rightly referring to them as "carbonated soft drinks," Coke wants us to name them "sparkling beverages." Hmm. Sounds a bit deceptive to me.

Reporter Stanford explains that:

"Coke executives say `carbonated soft drinks' have been stigmatized, and executives are using the new term to pull in an emerging generation of drinks that use light carbonation in everything from purified water to green tea. If the term `sparkling' sticks, then soft drinks like Diet Coke would be mentioned in the same breath as the company's Dasani carbonated water."

Excuse me? Mentioning Diet Coke in the same breath as Dasani's sparkling waer? So lower-calorie, artificially sweetened soda, when called "sparkling beverages," will somehow sound more nutritious?

Ah, come on, most of us are savvy enough not to be duped by this new term. Well, gee, I sure hope people will be smart enough not to fall for that.

It would be a tragedy to consider soft drinks healthy! In fact, as I've discussed here previously, some studies even suggest that these "diet drinks" lead to weight gain, not weight loss.

Other Coke plans include spending "money on everything from nutritional studies to awareness campaigns about diet and exercise," the AJC reporter explains.

And Coke also wants to draw people's attention away from soft drinks and toward sedentary lifestyles, even singling out video games as part of the problem.

Read journalist Stanford's article now.

Comments

[Darth Chaos]

No surprise that the Atlanta Journal-Constitution is on Coca-Cola's side...that's because the AJ-C is bought off by Coca-Cola, just like how every other mainstream media outlet is bought off by big corporate pigs. Just because a food or beverage is "vitamin-fortified" does NOT make it healthy. Case in point: Diet Coke Plus. It may have vitamins and minerals (actually such a tiny amount that it won't really do the body good), but it still has all those toxic chemicals, especially aspartame which actually INCREASES the likelihood of diabetes and weight gain. Unfortunately, Big Food's controlled opposition only has one "solution": "Give up your liberties, and we'll protect you from the evil food corporations." It's nothing but a classic case of a false left/right paradigm and "problem, reaction, solution". The phony-right neocons with Big Food and the CCF (the Center for Consumer Freedom or, more likely, the Center for Corporate Fascism) causes and brings about the problem, the public reacts and demands something be done against Big Food, and then the phony-left neolibs give their solution of taking away your liberties.....while not a damn thing is done to Big Food. No matter which phony side you put in trust in, you WILL get screwed.